back on, after a couple of months of silence, the blog of the Chair. This semester will be devoted especially to the children of Rovigo, and not exclude, however, comments from colleagues Ferrara.
The issue which closed today's lesson, after the ' overview of the reforms that have led to a shift from the current coding code Rocco ( better: the current regulatory framework in the field of criminal procedure) was this. Short trial and due process laws, the reforms and proposals based on the need to adapt the system of laws on criminal procedure to the principles of Constitution and supranational sources, ECHR in the first place. These realities are mutually compatible?
Same question, then, arises in relation all'attuanda code reform, as approved by the Executive 6 February 2009 and of which we have mentioned in class today, referring to the introduction of the reasons of convenience between the grounds for objection the judge and the new face of the relationship between PM and defender (and between PM and PG). A unique views
fragmented as ours, reflecting - as keenly supported some of you - the equally fragmented action of successive governments over the past decades. What do you think so? What solutions would you propose to - and still use the words someone to you - make the system of criminal procedure in this state equal to that existing in other Western nations (the reference, I think, was in Germany and the United States, although on the latter ordianamento we would have to say much .. .)?
comments Number ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment